“Obama to hit the road to avoid driving off the fiscal
cliff,” reads a CNN blog post.
Was this was what he meant by needing to be outside government to change it? It
seems that our beloved Cajoler in Chief is attempting to address the fiscal
cliff negotiations in Washington by going on a publicity tour. “Taking his case
to the American people” is the preferred term, but it looks to me like a
relapse. By being absent, the president is demonstrating that he’s gotten no
better at this part of his job since last year. What’s one more round of
wincing negotiations crammed into a first term?
Obama may expect a full knock-down drag-out fight, so it’s
possible that his zany political instincts are right on the money. Maybe his
handlers dragged him out. The junket could be a sign of the times, that all
politics are conducted in the hyperpublic sphere, so that actual events compete
with hypotheticals and top ten lists for news relevance.
The obvious risk is that many people inside Congress will be
put off by Obama’s persistent posturing. In Illinois, renowned tactician Rod
Blagojevich constantly made enemies with his tendency to “take the case to the
public” and subvert the traditional process. Perhaps the risk of such enmity is
smaller for this most visible of presidents. I would wager that Axelrod advised
an airing of his patented anti-elite rhetoric to the press; not a bad idea when
the opportunity cost is merely depriving the back room of Obama’s nubilous
presence. In any event, Obama’s remote brand of leadership repeats at
least two fumbles that helped stall last year’s debt deal: a reliance on
surrogates, and the corresponding confusion of power.
There’s a smug, bitter case to be made for him sitting out.
When my beloved Bears traded for Jay Cutler in 2009, I jokingly considered
their loss of two first-round picks in itself a victory. “We got a good quarterback
and these dumbasses get two years off from ruining the draft!” was my
gleeful logic. In other words, when someone is terrible at something, there are
occasions when their best move is to grab some bench. Well, Obama is terrible
at negotiating. He knows it, the White House knows it, and the Republicans know
it. So he’s sitting out. It is not a winning formula.
Last summer was more evidence of that than anyone cared to
see. The White House’s weakness during the debt ceiling debate disordered Washington’s
traditional power arrangement. Some of the most unprecedented screwing-with of
the president since Andrew Johnson occurred then. Even the gap-toothed
chart-haters that thrust upon this country a greater existential threat than
9/11, knew from his concessions on tax cuts, entitlements, drilling, and more,
that they could run wild. Something as small as Boehner sending Eric Cantor,
putative representative of the far right, into the preliminary negotiations,
would not have happened had Obama established himself as a shrewd opponent. At
the very least, GOP leadership would have kept Cantor and his caucus to a
tighter leash. On the other side, Obama sent in Biden to basically fix the
whole thing before it had to get to him. In doing so, the president exerted
less power than LBJ did during a powerful snore, and it opened the door to the right’s
fiscal vigilantism.
Biden was sent in because he possessed decades of insider
experience that the president lacked. Known internally as “The McConnell
Whisperer” for his unique ability to cajole the Senate Minority leader, the
vice president is a consummate old school politician. Boehner is cut from the
same cloth. Two of them in a back room could compromise oil and water over
cigars. Instead, Biden was paired with Cantor: two surrogates. When the talks
got stuck, Obama started working secretly with Boehner. Not only did the
exposure of those meetings stun Eric Cantor, who felt betrayed by being left
out of the loop, but Biden started making promises not corroborated by his
allies. The whole thing fell apart. The use of substitutes and the executive
branch’s milquetoast will made a mess out of the negotiation.
Obama is only going on the road for a day or two today, but
it speaks volumes to me. Hundreds of staffers and officials are running around
in Washington, relaying messages and strategizing in private quarters. They’re
trying to secure a deal big enough for the Republicans to claim a structural
victory, and revenue-positive enough for the administration to do the same.
Most of all, Obama just wants the recovery to continue, and would bark like a
dog in the State of the Union to have it so.
You know who wants no part of the nitty-gritty details? The “average
worker”. They want the same thing as the president. They want their lives to
continue uninterrupted by the failures and complaints of the people we elect to
take care of this stuff. There cannot be a large number of people who are going
to pick up the phone and convince their recalcitrant congressman to change his
mind after seeing Obama stroll around yet another factory. I guess Axelrod knows
more than me on that front. But as long as Obama sends the message that he’s
better off puffing up his rhetoric on a never-ending campaign, or on the View,
it tells me that the last place he wants to be is in that horse-trading parlor,
which whether we like it or not is the house of the stability that is our
American government.
Let it be known, this is what happens when you elect an
outsider. We claim to dislike politicians and their doublespeak, but few others
are equipped with the soft skills necessary to tackle a mammoth negotiation
like this. Unless a president had experience managing a super-complex merger in
the private sector, the scale of getting to this particular yes would be
intractable to people outside the Beltway. Obama may have good vision, and I
think he does, but he’ll never implement it by telling us. The president is
choosing to get in front of a microphone today, yet fewer people will hear his
words than those of Alex Jones. Get back there, Obama, and tell it to the
people who matter.
No comments:
Post a Comment